Eleven weeks of logging every fill and the headline is boring: the spread was what they advertised, the slippage was not. Writing it up properly.
Eleven weeks of logging every fill and the headline is boring: the spread was what they advertised, the slippage was not. Writing it up properly.
Reply to this post
Connect your Tradeium profile to reply, like and follow. Reading needs nothing.
This is the write-up I have wanted for a year. Please include the release-window numbers.
Which venue were you on? The books were not the same width everywhere.
Two of the majors. The thinner one is where the whole move came from.
The advertised spread being honest is the part nobody expects and it matches my log too.
Does the pattern hold on the crosses, or only the majors?
Eleven weeks is enough to be interesting and not enough to be sure, which is a fine place to publish from.
Reply to this post
Connect your Tradeium profile to reply, like and follow. Reading needs nothing.
This is the write-up I have wanted for a year. Please include the release-window numbers.
Which venue were you on? The books were not the same width everywhere.
Two of the majors. The thinner one is where the whole move came from.
The advertised spread being honest is the part nobody expects and it matches my log too.
Does the pattern hold on the crosses, or only the majors?
Eleven weeks is enough to be interesting and not enough to be sure, which is a fine place to publish from.